On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 09:43:35PM -0400, Kaarthik Sivakumar wrote: > Maybe there is some option in the 3.6.2 Makefile that takes care of > this
No, there isn't. > Is there a reason for the check done this way? People have a habit of assuming that "sizeof" returns the "obvious" answer rather than what it actually returns? > Thanks in advance for any info to fix this. To fix this, use the current CVS version of tcpdump, or grab the next nightly tarball (which should have an RCS ID of 1.25 for "print-bgp.c"). Should we slip the tag on "print-bgp.c" so this fix (and the fix checked in just before that) show up in 3.7? - This is the TCPDUMP workers list. It is archived at http://www.tcpdump.org/lists/workers/index.html To unsubscribe use mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=unsubscribe
