theo says recently added license clauses are problematical
as they have no terms specified.
itojun
------- Forwarded Message
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Mon Feb 18 18:50:00 2002
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sh1.iijlab.net (sh1.iijlab.net [3ffe:8020:0:1:260:97ff:fe07:69ea])
by coconut.itojun.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E684B22
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 18:50:00 +0900 (JST)
Received: by sh1.iijlab.net (Postfix)
id 7DA83C9; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 18:49:59 +0900 (JST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from cvs.openbsd.org (cvs.openbsd.org [199.185.137.3])
by sh1.iijlab.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD344C5
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 18:48:27 +0900 (JST)
Received: from cvs.openbsd.org (deraadt@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by cvs.openbsd.org (8.12.2/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g1I9pfWU005591
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 02:51:41 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CVS commit: basesrc
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 18 Feb 2002 18:41:52 +0900."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 02:51:41 -0700
From: Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Filter: mailagent [version 3.0 PL73] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
great. i see new license issues in it
stuff like this. there are others...
*
* Support for splitting captures into multiple files with a maximum
* file size:
*
* Copyright (c) 2001
* Seth Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*/
without terms specified, a copyright statement like that grants NO RIGHTS.
people just never learn, do they..
------- End of Forwarded Message
-
This is the TCPDUMP workers list. It is archived at
http://www.tcpdump.org/lists/workers/index.html
To unsubscribe use mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=unsubscribe
