Ok I see. But I still thinking that it can be more simple to use 2 interfaces. MITM be more simple if a make a real cut between your two system. But that is true that my vision is more oriented in a test lab way so ...
-----Message d'origine----- De : Alberto Ornaghi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : vendredi 9 janvier 2004 14:27 À : Jacky Buyck; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: RE : [tcpdump-workers] capturing and injection on same interface Jacky Buyck wrote: > Hmmmm ... The better can be simply to use a second interface. What is > the utility to modify and reinject a packet on the same link than the > good one : the receiver will always received the good packet first > ignoring your modified one. No ??? in a mitm attack the victim will not receive the packet until you forwardi it... > Except if you've a real need for this. think about a bridge in userland. since it has to be bidirectional, what you inject on one iface will be recaptured back as it was received from that interface... bye -- --==> ALoR <==---------------------- - - - There are only 10 types of people in this world... Those who understand binary, and those who don't. - This is the TCPDUMP workers list. It is archived at http://www.tcpdump.org/lists/workers/index.html To unsubscribe use mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]