On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 09:50:04PM -0700, Bill Fenner wrote:
>
> >BTW: I wonder if there isn't a standard for uint32_t (as used in glibc) or
> >something like this. Every little tool seems to declare its own
> >myname_int32 :(
>
> Yes, the Single Unix Specification's <inttypes.h> defines int32_t, uint32_t,
> etc. However, it's probably better to allow configure to define u_int32_t
> as uint32_t rather than try to fix all of the source...
I would rather fix the source than define a bunch of new types - if
the right way is to go with the definitions from inttypes.h then I think
we should do that.
OTOH I don't know how widely those types are available on current
operating systems...
cu
Torsten
PGP signature
