All - I'd encourage you to try out our current tcpcrypt version from: http://tcpcrypt.org/download.php
We support OS X, Windows and Linux. There're prebuilt OS X and Windows binaries. You can check the status of various people testing the product on different platforms here: http://tcpcrypt.org/fame.php Please let us know if you encounter any issues. Thanks On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 2:46 AM, Mirja Kühlewind < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > at the last meeting, we also tried to figure out if there are potentially > more people that would be interested/willing to implement the proposed > schemes. The feedback at this time was that people don’t want to implement > something that might potentially not be standardized. > > Now that we are heading towards the publication of tcpcrypt as the default > mechanism, we like to ask again and figure if anybody is currently > implementing tcpcrypt/plans to implement it/is willing to implement it in > the near future. > > As there is also already an implementation by the authors, it shows that > the proposed approach is feasible to implement. As such this is a good > basis to move on. However, if we could get a second independent > implementation, it would also show that the specification as described in > the current draft is solid and comprehensive. This would be very helpful to > ensure that we as a group did a good job! > > Let us know what your plans are! > > Mirja, Kyle and David > _______________________________________________ > Tcpinc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
_______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
