I recall making this point for tcpcrypt but I gave up on most of what happens here long ago. I'm not surprised the group insists on making the same mistake twice.
Please at least don't break the rest of tcp in the process. Jie > On Apr 28, 2016, at 6:38 PM, David Mazieres > <dm-list-tcpcr...@scs.stanford.edu> wrote: > > More importantly, I don't want to keep re-litigating this point. If > you'd formed working group consensus around getting an ExID, we would > have switched to RFC6994. _______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list Tcpinc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
