"Black, David" <[email protected]> writes: > I'm likely to be the shepherd for this draft (but if anyone else is > interested, please email the WG chairs - [email protected]).
Thanks for the feedback. We're about to release a new draft of TCP-ENO. I'll try to incorporate some of your feedback, but want to get the new draft out as soon as possible, so might end up releasing two drafts in rapid succession. Anyone else considering reviewing TCP-ENO who hasn't started reading yet might want to wait a day or two... High-level, in addition to addressing specific feedback we got before, we are trying to separate the "what" from the "why," so that someone who just wants to implement TCP-ENO doesn't have to wade through a bunch of rationale to see what to do. This is something Jana has been pushing for a while, and I think it will make for a better document, but the changes are pretty extensive, which is what is delaying the next draft. So basically I probably want to get through that restructuring before I turn to your feedback, but should be able to get to both in the next week. Sorry for the bad timing. David _______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
