Kyle Rose <[email protected]> writes: > do we need some explicit signaling from the server on a prior > connection for when SYN data on resumption attempts is okay, or is > "...but SHOULD limit such usage..." good enough?
This is precisely the question on which some input from more experienced members of the working group could be helpful. Basically I'd like to ensure that ENO conflicts as little as possible with future use of data in SYN segments. So rather than just flat-out prohibiting it (and having people not even test the corner case), I think it would be good to specify that receivers explicitly ignore the data in places where it couldn't possibly be useful. And then once you are there, why not say that TEPs MAY define data but probably shouldn't send it for the time being in the remaining cases. David _______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
