On 7/29/2016 12:24 PM, David Mazieres wrote: > Joe Touch <[email protected]> writes: > >> FWIW, IMO the best wording would: >> >> - start with the simplest case, i.e., NOT trying to optimize EDO to use >> SYN data >> >> - present the use of SYN data with EDO as an optimization >> that optimization might be a MAY or SHOULD, but not a MUST >> >> Otherwise, you're needlessly complicating your spec for an optimization. > I'm not sure I follow. The issue here is about application data that > needs to be decrypted, acked, and delivered in order. EDO would seem to s/EDO/ENO/
Joe _______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
