Good catch. I agree. Joe
> On Aug 5, 2016, at 3:52 PM, Black, David <[email protected]> wrote: > > This looks good, although I think this "SHOULD" requirement ought to be a > "MUST": > >>> If a host sends a SYN-only SYN+ENO segment bearing data and >>> subsequently receives a SYN-ACK segment without an ENO option, that >>> host SHOULD reset the connection even if the SYN-ACK segment does not >>> acknowledge the SYN data. _______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
