|
What was his concerns with the various schemas already available? TDWG schemas , LSID vocabs, etc?
If I understand it correctly, here is some rdf for his simple example using the LSID vocabs RDF (http://wiki.tdwg.org/twiki/bin/view/TAG/LsidVocs) :
<rdf:RDF xmlns:tn="http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/TaxonName#" xmlns:owl ="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:rdf ="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"> <foaf:Person rdf:about="http://tobyinkster.co.uk/~tobyink/"> <foaf:name>Toby Inkster</foaf:name> <tn:nameComplete>Amanita abrupta</tn:nameComplete>
</foaf:Person> </rdf:RDF> Am I missing something?
Also, his lack of interest in using Unique Identifiers is disconcerting.
Kevin
>>> Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 28/05/2008 8:40 a.m. >>> A friend writes: Unable to find a vocabulary that was satisfactory for my needs, I've put together a simple vocabulary for biological taxonomy. The idea is to make it powerful enough to cover 80% of use cases, but still simple for most non-expert biologists to use. Namespace and spec is: http://purl.org/NET/biol/0.1/ You can read his full post, and subsequent discussion, at: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2008May/thread.html#msg45> (aka <http://tinyurl.com/575w25>) (Also posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Andy Mabbett _______________________________________________ tdwg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg
WARNING
: This email and any attachments may be confidential and/or privileged. They
are intended for the addressee only and are not to be read, used,
copied or disseminated by anyone receiving them in error. If you are
not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by return email
and delete this message and any attachments. |
_______________________________________________ tdwg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg
