Judith,

I would present biological determinism with Phrenology and Social Darwinism as examples of popular yet bad science.  And then show how some of us have moved
on.  I think that it is important to recognize that many sociologists as well as other scientists (many with great credentials) have become faith based rather than science based.
That is what Durkheim called mechanical rather than organic.  There is great upside in the mechinical in the short term although it leads to entropic ruin.  The mechanical is based
on adopting and sameness rather than adapting and diversity and relies on brut force to force things to "work".  That is why it takes 20 to 30% of the worlds resources to run our
 nation 5% of the worlds population. 

Next the  universe including the things we study are in flux thus what  the classical tradition / mechanical must  do is ignore uncertainty this is linked to durkheim's claim  that the
 mechanical is primitive. Fuzzy sets as in fuzzy logic was invented to deal with the organic and the uncertain and not crisp.   This also gives you a chance to discuss Darwin adapt rather than adopt. 
In the real things can be + and - male and female at the same time. 

Unfortunatly many of our texts (whcih themselves have not been tested) present a crisp set of facts to be adopted so you may have to use readings.  There is the pepsi vs coke study
using fMRI data that shows that thinking is governed not determined by the definition of the situation.

Sorry to ramble but it is late and our daughter is on a bus somewhere because of train failure between Ney York and PA.

Del


Judith Doyle wrote:
I was thinking about arguments which assert that human
behavour is biological in origin; that our biology
determines our behaviours leaving little room for
agency, culture, nurture etc. Particularly, I was
thinking about the trend to attribute social
behaviours to genetics. Some experts, for example,
assert that problem gambling is to do with our genes. 


--- "Del Thomas Ph. D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

  
What do you mean by biological determinism? The
recent data particularly 
fMRI and PEP show that there is more adapting than
determined.  After all if you controll for time
Darwin is about learning.

Del


Judith Doyle wrote:

    
Hi All, 

For my intro class, I have an assignment due at the
beginning of the third week in term. It draws on
      
the
    
second chapter of the textbook looking at biology
      
and
    
culture. I want to get them to think about
      
biological
    
determinism, 'human nature' that sort of stuff and
maybe have them do some research that teaches them
      
so
    
information literacy skills. 

I know that much but am having trouble, pardon the
phrase, actualizing it. Maybe because I would
      
prefer
    
to be outside on a sunny August day!?

Does anyone have an assignment (whether in class or
not) that covers some of this?

Thanks muchly! 
Judith
***********************************
Dr. Judith Doyle
Sociology
Mount Allison University
Sackville, NB, Canada



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
      
protection around 
    
http://mail.yahoo.com 

 

      
    




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

  

Reply via email to