|
Judith, I would present biological determinism with Phrenology and Social Darwinism as examples of popular yet bad science. And then show how some of us have moved on. I think that it is important to recognize that many sociologists as well as other scientists (many with great credentials) have become faith based rather than science based. That is what Durkheim called mechanical rather than organic. There is great upside in the mechinical in the short term although it leads to entropic ruin. The mechanical is based on adopting and sameness rather than adapting and diversity and relies on brut force to force things to "work". That is why it takes 20 to 30% of the worlds resources to run our nation 5% of the worlds population. Next the universe including the things we study are in flux thus what the classical tradition / mechanical must do is ignore uncertainty this is linked to durkheim's claim that the mechanical is primitive. Fuzzy sets as in fuzzy logic was invented to deal with the organic and the uncertain and not crisp. This also gives you a chance to discuss Darwin adapt rather than adopt. In the real things can be + and - male and female at the same time. Unfortunatly many of our texts (whcih themselves have not been tested) present a crisp set of facts to be adopted so you may have to use readings. There is the pepsi vs coke study using fMRI data that shows that thinking is governed not determined by the definition of the situation. Sorry to ramble but it is late and our daughter is on a bus somewhere because of train failure between Ney York and PA. Del Judith Doyle wrote: I was thinking about arguments which assert that human behavour is biological in origin; that our biology determines our behaviours leaving little room for agency, culture, nurture etc. Particularly, I was thinking about the trend to attribute social behaviours to genetics. Some experts, for example, assert that problem gambling is to do with our genes.--- "Del Thomas Ph. D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: |
- TEACHSOC: RE: Out-of-class reading assignments and field... Roberts, Keith
- TEACHSOC: Re: Out-of-class reading assignments and ... Sarah Murray
- TEACHSOC: Re: Out-of-class reading assignments and ... Roberts, Keith
- TEACHSOC: Re: Out-of-class reading assignments and ... stjohn
- TEACHSOC: Biological determinism, nature/nurtur... Judith Doyle
- TEACHSOC: Re: Biological determinism, natur... Del Thomas Ph. D.
- TEACHSOC: Re: Biological determinism, n... Judith Doyle
- TEACHSOC: Re: Biological determini... Del Thomas Ph. D.
- TEACHSOC: Is sociology asleep ... Del Thomas Ph. D.
- TEACHSOC: Re: Is sociology... klausner
- TEACHSOC: Re: Is sociology... Del Thomas Ph. D.
- TEACHSOC: Re: Biological determinism, natur... Walter Dean
