Makes sense. Thanks for the clarification! -Katie
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Greg Grossmeier <g...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > <quote name="Steven Walling" date="2014-03-14" time="12:42:52 -0700"> > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Katie Horn <kh...@wikimedia.org> > wrote: > > > > > I see that "gerrit" is listed under "status quo", which seems to imply > > > that replacing gerrit is, if not on the table, then hovering near the > > > table. > > > > > > Is that an accurate implication? If so, I didn't realize that the > scope of > > > this discussion extended to code review tools as well as PM tools, and > so > > > have probably vastly underrepresented some things in the previous > requests > > > for team information. > > > > > > > It basically only within scope if Phabricator is one of our strongly > > considered options (which it is). Most of the other tools listed focus > more > > on issues/project management, but Phabricator also potentially replaces > the > > code review and repository viewing portions of our toolkit. > > Which then has mega benefits with everything being in the same place.... > ohmygoshthepossibilities > > > -- > | Greg Grossmeier GPG: B2FA 27B1 F7EB D327 6B8E | > | identi.ca: @greg A18D 1138 8E47 FAC8 1C7D | > > _______________________________________________ > teampractices mailing list > teampractices@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices >
_______________________________________________ teampractices mailing list teampractices@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices