In the past, the "Wikimedia Engineering/2014-15 Goals" wiki page and the quarterly reviews were the main venues to communicate and discuss future plans.
Now quarterly reviews are strictly about the past quarter, and only the top goal of each team is documented in the wiki page. This is probably good enough to have a clear top level view of the critical WMF activities. Still, this leaves out a lot of planning and work. There is also the #Roadmap project in Phabricator, although this is restricted mostly to user/developer facing software changes, which again doesn't reflect all the work teams do. What ECT is doing now is: * document the single top goal in https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Engineering/2014-15_Goals as instructed * document our other quarterly goals in a Phabricator task blocked by the related epics, i.e. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T93770 * If any epic deserves to be on #Roadmap or #Notice, then we associate these tags accordingly. Is this a good approach? -- Quim Gil Engineering Community Manager @ Wikimedia Foundation http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Qgil
_______________________________________________ teampractices mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices
