FWIW, in my (limited) experience, MVP is an industry term widely used, and I haven't encountered MMP. There is something to be said for unified industry lingo.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:14 AM, James Douglas <jdoug...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > Joking aside, I'm not too concerned with the overloadedness of terms we > use, as long as we have consensus on what they mean. > > I'd be much more excited to define the thing that we're designating as > MMP, i.e. "the bundle of features that satisfy user stories X, Y, and Z". > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:10 AM, James Douglas <jdoug...@wikimedia.org> > wrote: > >> Model View Presenter? :] >> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Kevin Smith <ksm...@wikimedia.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Kind of a small issue, but I find myself leaning toward MMP (Minimum >>> Marketable Product) rather than MVP (Minimum Viable Product). Although I >>> prefer "viable", and MVP is catchy, it is also confusing and ambiguous, >>> thanks to MVP (Most Valuable Player). >>> >>> Am I alone in preferring an acronym that isn't overloaded? >>> >>> >>> Kevin Smith >>> Agile Coach >>> Wikimedia Foundation >>> >>> >>> >>> *Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in >>> the sum of all knowledge. That's our commitment. Help us make it a reality.* >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> teampractices mailing list >>> teampractices@lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices >>> >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > teampractices mailing list > teampractices@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices > >
_______________________________________________ teampractices mailing list teampractices@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices