On 17 November 2008 13:30, Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shish...@teleca.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 03:47:56PM +0000, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: >> Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@britannica.bec.de> wrote: >> > On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 12:10:28PM +0000, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: >> > > Any concerns on this patch? >> > >> > Hooking this into timecounters is a completely wrong abstraction. >> > I'm fine with the userland side, but the kernel internals are simply >> > wrong. >> >> It seems we agree that a long-term solution would be basing everything on >> callouts, however this code could still be a short-term solution. > It's not quite like a short-term solution, but more a first step in the > general direction of kernel high-resolution timers. Existing callouts > interface would have to be changed as well to achieve what we're after. > Some ideas were mentioned on the wiki page [1]. > > [1]: http://wiki.netbsd.se/high_resolution_timers#Roadmap > > Regards, > -- > Alex >
Did this code ever get committed/tested/reworked ? -- ~Cherry
