On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 02:06:34AM +0000, David Holland wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 07:49:43PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > > I'm not in favor of LOCKDEBUG by default, for reasons already stated
> here.
> >
> > Also, could LOCKDEBUG have ABI issues with modules ?
> > I've only ever used LOCKDEBUG with non-MODULAR kernels ...
>
> The whole reason LOCKDEBUG is abysmally slow is that it does crazy
> things to preserve the same ABI. Personally I think this is a poor
> tradeoff...
But if LOCKDEBUG changes the ABI, then you need a different set of modules.
not that I care much about modules (and especially having them independant
from the kernel) ...
--
Manuel Bouyer <bou...@antioche.eu.org>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--
