Another DAHDI porting caveat. They use stuff like this to define a
static kmutex_t outside any function:
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pseudo_free_list_lock);
NetBSD needs to do this in order to initialize a mutex:
static kmutex_t pseudo_free_list_lock;
mutex_init(&pseudo_free_list_lock, MUTEX_SPIN, IPL_NET)
There is no way to make this fit together, right? As I understand I need
to run a driver initilization hook to call mutex_init for all mutexes
that are defined this way in the drivers (I cound 12 occurences).
Am I correct? There Is No Alternatrive?
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
