Hi, all. I sent the followin mail more than two years ago.
> http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2010/07/28/msg008613.html As the starting point to solve this problem, I committed the change to add SIOCGETHERCAP stuff. Example: > msk0: flags=8802<BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > ec_capabilities=5<VLAN_MTU,JUMBO_MTU> > ec_enabled=0 > address: 00:50:43:00:4b:c5 > media: Ethernet autoselect > status: no carrier > wm0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > capabilities=7ff80<TSO4,IP4CSUM_Rx,IP4CSUM_Tx,TCP4CSUM_Rx,TCP4CSUM_Tx,UDP4CSUM_Rx,UDP4CSUM_Tx,TCP6CSUM_Rx,TCP6CSUM_Tx,UDP6CSUM_Rx,UDP6CSUM_Tx,TSO6> > > enabled=7ff80<TSO4,IP4CSUM_Rx,IP4CSUM_Tx,TCP4CSUM_Rx,TCP4CSUM_Tx,UDP4CSUM_Rx,UDP4CSUM_Tx,TCP6CSUM_Rx,TCP6CSUM_Tx,UDP6CSUM_Rx,UDP6CSUM_Tx,TSO6> > ec_capabilities=7<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU> > ec_enabled=0 > address: 00:1b:21:58:68:34 > media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT > full-duplex,flowcontrol,rxpause,txpause) > status: active > inet 192.168.1.5 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 > inet6 fe80::21b:21ff:fe58:6834%wm0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 > inet6 2001:240:694:1:21b:21ff:fe58:6834 prefixlen 64 What do you think about this output? -- ----------------------------------------------- SAITOH Masanobu (msai...@execsw.org msai...@netbsd.org)
