On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 01:49:09AM +0300, Alan Barrett wrote: > If necessary, the open(2) syscall could be versioned so that > O_RDONLY is no longer defined as zero.
This seems possibly worth doing to avoid all the annoyance with FREAD/FWRITE vs. O_RDONLY/O_WRONLY, but I really don't see how it's connected to the rest... -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
