> Is that wrong, or am I missing something else? Well, I guess that you could end up with the third 512b-block failing and so your 4k chunk written halfway through. Whoever cares about that.
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance pro... Mouse
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance pro... Michael van Elst
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance pro... David Laight
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance pro... David Holland
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance pro... Michael van Elst
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance pro... Mouse
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance pro... David Holland
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance pro... Mouse
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance pro... David Holland
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance pro... Mouse
- Disc block size (was: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDfra... Edgar Fuß
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance pro... Michael van Elst
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance pro... David Holland
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance pro... Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance pro... David Holland
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance pro... David Laight
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance pro... Julian Yon
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance pro... David Holland
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance pro... Julian Yon
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance pro... David Holland
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance pro... Michael van Elst