In article <74e9a033-b75c-45b8-beee-a7380baa8...@gmail.com>,
Garrett Cooper  <yaneg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Jan 13, 2013, at 12:59 AM, Martin Husemann wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 08:49:06AM +0000, David Holland wrote:
>>> Nope, don't have that kind of setup and atf is way too invasive to
>>> allow just building the test programs somewhere else.
>> 
>> ATF is available from pkgsrc and straight forward to install, so I tried
>> on FreeBSD 9, but they do not have O_SEARCH:
>
>       ATF is available on FreeBSD CURRENT (and will be the defacto test
>infrastructure for FreeBSD) as of last October and we're working towards
>having a sane set of wrapper Makefiles for producing tests (based
>largely on what jmmv did for NetBSD, but divergent because the build
>systems are divergent).

Would it make sense then to provide the tests as a shared separate repository
managed by both projects? I think a large number of the tests can be shared.

christos

Reply via email to