On Nov 16, 9:30pm, lourival.n...@gmail.com (Lourival Vieira Neto) wrote: -- Subject: Re: [patch] changing lua_Number to int64_t
| On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Christos Zoulas <chris...@astron.com> wrote: | > In article <52872b0c.5080...@msys.ch>, Marc Balmer <m...@msys.ch> wrote: | >>Changing the number type to int64_t is certainly a good idea. Two | >>questions, however: | > | > Why not intmax_t? | | My only argument is that int64_t has a well-defined width and, AFAIK, | intmax_t could vary. But I have no strong feelings about this. Do you | think intmax_t would be better? Bigger is better. And you can use %jd to print which is a big win. christos
