Alexander Nasonov wrote: > Yes, I understand this but I don't understand why to you need a special > control for it. It's your choice as a programmer to call that function > or not to call. Why do you need a special variable/syscal to control this?
Ok, I missed luactl(8) part I guess. I don't know your usecase but this remote orchestration of kernel Lua state from userspace sounds a bit dodgy to me. Since you support 'luactl require' you can use it to load base libraries. There is no need for a boolean flag if you already have a more generic mechanism in place. Alex