Darren Reed <darr...@netbsd.org> wrote: > On 16/12/2013 3:20 AM, Alexander Nasonov wrote: > > > .. > > This discussion is going to nowhere. At this point, someone from > > outside should review our opinions and help us to make a decision. > > It is one hack after another to support NPF using tables in BPF. >
Nice try, but you missed it. NPF tables are already supported and have been happily working for a good while. The discussion is not really about them. Try again. -- Mindaugas
