In article <1lfyrch.n0en6eho0ft6m%m...@netbsd.org>,
Emmanuel Dreyfus <m...@netbsd.org> wrote:
>Since nobody opposes, I am going to commit that. Perhaps the option name
>could be better: NATIVE_EMULROOT or EMULROOT_NATIVE?
>
>> --- sys/kern/kern_exec.c.orig 2014-01-21 16:55:00.000000000 +0100
>> +++ sys/kern/kern_exec.c 2014-01-21 16:55:13.000000000 +0100
>> @@ -184,9 +184,13 @@
>>
>> /* NetBSD emul struct */
>> struct emul emul_netbsd = {
>> .e_name = "netbsd",
>> +#ifdef COMPAT_NATIVE
>> + .e_path = COMPAT_NATIVE,
>> +#else
>> .e_path = NULL,
>> +#endif
>> #ifndef __HAVE_MINIMAL_EMUL
>> .e_flags = EMUL_HAS_SYS___syscall,
>> .e_errno = NULL,
>> .e_nosys = SYS_syscall,
I think EMUL_NATIVEROOT is better, since everything starts with EMUL?
christos
