On Jul 2, 8:41pm, m...@netbsd.org wrote: } On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 08:38:24PM +0000, m...@netbsd.org wrote: } > On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 01:16:15PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote: } > > The solution is to implement "tickless kernel". It is not that difficult. } > } > It looks like we are always descheduling the thread, not jut because we } > got a clock tick. even a tickless kernel won't help stupid. } } to clarify, I mean, "it won't help, because we are being stupid", not } as an insult.
Saying, "we are being stupid," could most definitely be an insult to the people that wrote the code in question. I seriously doubt that we are being stupid in this case. }-- End of excerpt from m...@netbsd.org