On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:40:20AM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote: > I saw the thread [Re: Sample based profiling] on tech-userlevel@, I'm not > subscribed to this list but I'm answering here because it's related to > tprof among other things. > > I agree that it would be better to retire gprof in base, because there are > more powerful tools now, and also advanced hardware support (PMC, PEBS, > ProcessorTrace).
Speaking of old ratty tools, got a plan for replacing gcov? :-) -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
