mo...@rodents-montreal.org (Mouse) writes: >>> I'd tend to assume it is the code.
>Well, then, there never can be any such thing as a bug in jot. The original code (see rev 1.1) seems to be more clear on how the parameters should be evaluated.
mo...@rodents-montreal.org (Mouse) writes: >>> I'd tend to assume it is the code.
>Well, then, there never can be any such thing as a bug in jot. The original code (see rev 1.1) seems to be more clear on how the parameters should be evaluated.