> Are you sure you're not confusing this with the behaviour (which I *do* > expect) of seeing the FIFO open block until a matching open is done? Ah, sorry, that's probably it. So, is /that behaviour/ guaranteed?
Is it safe to have process A create the FIFO, pass the name to process B, open it for writing (write to it), and then "immediately" delete it? Is it then guaranteed that process B will be able to open the FIFO (and, of course, read from it)?
