On 2016-05-03 20:23, Rob Austein wrote: > I looked for usable libraries with better licenses before suggesting > libcli. Eg, there's the old Columbia-MM reimplementation of the > TOPS-20 COMND% JSYS (conceptual ancestor of the cisco CLI by way of > the Stanford Ethertip), but the code is old and crufty. > > I think LGPL, while not great, is acceptable, in that it only requires > users to give away source to libcli itself. In particular, it does > NOT GPL-contaminate everything to which it's linked. > > I think that, if we want a usable command line interface soon, libcli > is probably the way to go. We do have a few other things that we need > to get done before Berlin.
+1 also Jacobs suggestion makes sense - ask about dual licensing for this project _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cryptech.is/listinfo/tech
