> > There is nothing wrong with using the
> > data source node, as long as it is not overloaded or physically farer
> > away then the cache.
> 
> How do you know whether the data source is overloaded or physically more
> distant?  Freenet's way of distributing load might not be optimal in all
> cases, but deliberately concentrating load seems like a poor alternative.
> 

The requests to a data source node, that are caused by a redirect can be
marked,
to be low priority. The data source node may answer with the query
reject message, 
that overloaded nodes use now. The load is thus just as much
concentrated on 
the node as it can handle.

An overloaded caching node can even unburden itself by returning a
redirect 
instead of the data.

You could use the ping time or the number of common leading bits in the
ip address
as a measure of distance.

> > How do you keep spammers or flooders from using "hint" messages to make
> > their data popular?
> 
> How do you keep spammers from using automatically generated requests for the
> same effect at even greater cost (with or without redirects), or inserting
> tons of their garbage to push everything else out of everyone's cache and/or
> clog up the network?  

The spammer will need much more bandwidth to do that at least for the
inserts.
And existing weak points in freenet are not an argument to open up even
more.

> Hit-count updates would only have as much credence or
> effect as the recipient is willing to give them based on authentication,
> past history, etc.  If it smells funny, drop it.  After all, it was only a
> hint so, by definition, dropping it won't break anything.  Dropping
> redirected requests would be much more disruptive.

You misunderstood me. The node receiving a redirect may choose not to
follow it.
It can always request the data again and specify, that it won't accept a
redirect. This works after a dropped or failed request to the data
source node, too.

--
 Thomas Leske

_______________________________________________
freenet-tech mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/tech

Reply via email to