> Well the big showstopper wrt contributing for me is that Tor is a
> Darpa sponsored project.
> One of the big technical issues for me with Tor is that you can
> probably always expect the encryption to be something the U.S.
> controls at some level.

Are you saying that if you distributed the GPL'd Tor code patched with a
crypto algorithm that you don't believe the government can easily crack
you would be disappeared or something? Sounds like a pretty lame reason
for not contributing to Tor to me. Darpa has influence on who gets funding
but that's about it, especially when it comes to open source projects
where everything happens in public.

> this technology will be key to shaping the future of the internet.  I
> would also like to know if one of the points on the roadmap for this
> project include implementing things like email and URLs for http-ish
> services.  I am very excited to get in on the ground floor as well.

I think there used to be an "everything over freenet" project. fproxy
already implements http-ish services. But only for publishing information.
Interactive things like cgi etc are not and will probably never be
possible in the traditional freenet scheme unless it is by i2p type
functionality.



Reply via email to