> this would be great, combined with a possibility to allocate > more than one of these one-file-datastores (avoiding the > mono-word here *g*), possibly on different disks.
I second that! Atm I'm using my older "smaller" HDs for freenet, which is fine, but I'm on windoze and I'm using software striping (dynamic disks) so I can add disks easily. The only problem is, if one fails, the whole lot goes. If I could mount the drives separately, then I'd only lose part of the DS. Of course, it would be easier on linux cos you could just symlink key directories to different mount points or something, but it's too late for me to change now! MrFlibble
