Which of these is more important? - SSKs -> minimal FCPv2 -> working frost boards, and maybe working frost filesharing too. (splitfiles work right now) - Manifests -> SSKs -> Fproxy (with initially command line site insert). - Opennet support. - Ability to fetch logs from nodes...
Current issues: 1. We need money. Fast. One way to get this is to get some general enthusiasm amongst the Freenet userbase. Another is to get some amongst the slashdot crowd. Either way, we need more people on the network, and we need more apps. 2. We need more nodes. We need more people on the network. Problems: a) To debug properly, I need people to be online when their node is, so they can send me their logs if I want them. Possible fix: Make the node automatically send me logs if I ask for it; minimal testnet support. Then we can have all nodes online more or less permanently. b) Can just ask for more testers. (Come to #freenet-alphatest on irc.freenode.net if you want in!) c) Opennet is a possibility, but we don't want to have opennet support before we have shown that the darknet can vaguely work, and finished with the datastore format changes. Opennet is much less tested theoretically than darknet. 3. We need apps. a) Frost. If I implement SSKs, then a minimal FCP, then Frost should just about work, once it is rewritten a bit. b) Fproxy. If I implement SSKs, and manifests, then I can implement Fproxy, with sites initially being inserted through the command line interface. IMHO it is not yet time for opennet support, as we haven't finished playing with the datastore... The current testnet is very small. -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20051118/d88b32d9/attachment.pgp>
