jrandom at i2p.net wrote: >Yes, its more expensive to compromise one node at a > time, but in hostile regimes, where that person may be imprisoned or > summarily killed when they're compromised, its little comfort for them > to hear "well, it took them longer than it would have in I2P!" > > If the trail leads through a foreign node then they can't follow it, which isn't the case with harvesting.
>again, how many dead users is OK with you? > > That's the third time you've asked and still no bites. Cheers, Michael
