On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 06:30:20PM -0400, jrandom at i2p.net wrote: > > I'm not sure how field tested dijjer's comm is though, as the > project doesn't seem too active (at least, not on the lists publicly > available). I do recall reading Toad suggest that he'd have to do > a lot of revamp though, and then there's that whole beast of a meta > state-machine framework just to avoid threads...
No, the current 0.7 code, and the current Dijjer code, make copious use of threads, on the grounds that when and if we do need to compress it into fewer threads, there will be a means to do so (continuations). -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20051014/f286af02/attachment.pgp>
