Is it reasonably easy to use? I assume it has good merging? On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 05:12:57AM -0400, Paul M. wrote: > Git is currently being used for the Linux kernel. Its distributed, > cryptographically signed, and does per-file change tracking. > ~Paul > > Home Page > http://kernel.org/git/ > About > http://git.or.cz/ > Howto > http://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/tutorial.html > > On 9/23/05, Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 10:22:40PM -0400, Janzert wrote: > > > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > >http://www.gnu.org/software/gnu-arch/ > > > > > > > >Anyone had any experience? There is already a port to freenet, and the > > > >guy who wrote it might perhaps be persuaded to update it; if not, we > > > >might, eventually. The description sounds good. > > > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > Just as another data point, Bram Cohen blogged about some of the > > > available source control systems around the time Linus was making > > > headlines with them. Although it's an obviously biased view (he is one > > > of the primary developers of one of the systems, Codeville) it still > > > might be useful. > > > > > > The main post is at > > > http://www.livejournal.com/users/bramcohen/17319.html and there were a > > > couple follow ups if you browse around. > > > > Well, codeville is definitely too immature for our purposes. Monotone > > doesn't have proper secure history support. And the merging advantages > > of the newer SCMs may not be all that they appear. Darcs's patch-based > > structure is nice, but the lack of a proper hash-based history isn't; in > > general Darcs is immature. Probably we should go with Subversion; it > > looks like there is some way yet to go with the distributed SCMs. > > > > > > Janzert > > -- > > Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org > > Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ > > ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) > > > > iD8DBQFDM9XFHzsuOmVUoi0RAj1SAKClhCnPP/AmA7gIo0a215HvJGo4lACgtOTy > > fPIwjz4T/JlinstvbXdJ8B0= > > =ltEA > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tech mailing list > > Tech at freenetproject.org > > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tech mailing list > Tech at freenetproject.org > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
-- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20050926/55109c64/attachment.pgp>
