On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 10:08:40AM -0700, Ryan Fugger wrote:
> On 4/6/06, Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote:
> > Exposing topology is bad, I agree, but it seems to be the only way to
> > make swapping entirely secure... and it's also required for premix
> > routing. We don't necessarily have to expose *all* the topology..
> 
> But each node would have to expose all his neighbours to each of his
> neighbours, no?

Well for premix we'd probably have a cell structure; 100 nodes in a cell,
collaborative credibility determination, each credible node is equally
likely to be chosen for a tunnel; use 2 or 3 nodes for a premix tunnel.
> 
> You wouldn't need to require TPM authentication, but it would be nice
> to be able to be completely certain that your neighbours were running
> uncorrupted versions of benevolent software.

Ummm...
> 
> > Well it's somewhat anonymous, but really it needs a premix layer on top.
> > There are statistical attacks possible with requests, probably with
> > anything else that can be easily correlated; the basic problems are:
> > - If you make a bundle of requests for a splitfile, your neighbour nodes
> >   will be able to see (if they are clever and know the splitfile) that
> >   these requests are connected, and that you're requesting too big a
> >   part of it to be (likely) forwarding requests for other nodes.
> > - That the request is a long way away from the target location: the node
> >   you got it from is forwarding a request which is very close to the
> >   originator node, or it would have gotten further by now.
> >
> > Both of these can be used for fairly powerful attacks, assuming you are
> > directly connected to the target; we will in 0.8 introduce premix
> > routing.
> 
> Isn't the point of a darknet to place the responsibility on the user
> to connect only to those that won't attack them?

Indeed, but sadly treachery is a fact of life, a universal constant,
like greed.
> 
> Ryan
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20060406/f29feecd/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to