I'm not denying that we may end up with several darknets which are only loosely connected. But I see no reason to expect them to be tiny.
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 03:21:36PM -0400, Colin wrote: > > > >I don't see why (in the long run). The properties of human networks > >are > >such that I would expect darknets to go quickly from having a few > >links > >to having many links. > > I'm not sure that's true... People have lots of links in their social > circle, hell, in their society... > How many people do you know in China? How many do you know, that know > people in China? > How many in Russia? > > As far as I know, no real world tests have ever gone across multiple > countries and cultures like that... > (Not to mention that Milgrim's tests mostly weren't very reliable to > begin with) > > -Colin > > > _______________________________________________ > Tech mailing list > Tech at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech > -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20060831/63c29325/attachment.pgp>
