On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 01:16:26PM +0000, Michael Rogers wrote: > toad wrote: > >>I've > >>experimented with LIFO instead of FIFO in some simulations of a flooding > >>protocol and it seems to work well there too. > > > >Surely it is an artefact? > > It seems to be reproducible in a simple round-based simulator > (attached). FIFO is better at low loads with short queues, but otherwise > LIFO is better. Short queues seem to work better overall.
I don't understand. Why is LIFO better? Are you allowing *ALL* requests to complete before reporting the result? > > We should tell the Gnutella people. ;-) > > Cheers, > Michael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20061213/80517895/attachment.pgp>
