On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 02:32:07PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > > >So I > >have come to the conclusion that the config file should be bare, > >with no > >comments whatsoever. > > In the interests of expediency, I can agree to this - although we may > want to allow for comments in the future.
Well, as I have explained, if the node is writing the config file and keeping it up to date, then users editing the comments it puts in to explain params will be a major PITA. > > Ian. -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20060202/368ba10d/attachment.pgp>
