On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 11:23:33PM +0000, NextGen$ wrote: > > so, in short: > > separation of a huge native lib into smaller libpacks - yes > > let them have the same name - many, some small and some large, NO!s > > > > Well, it's basicaly a tradeoff : Code duplication against ease of use for > some power users (I don't think that many people are moving around their > node on different CPUs/OSes). > > What do Higher Gods think ?
He makes a fair point... lets say the libraries are named. The installer fetches the correct library. If you run the node through the installer, it will check and if necessary fetch new libraries. How's that? Also if we want to have the distro servlet then we will want the node to download (from freenet) the other libraries (after installation). > > NextGen$ -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20060216/657e56e0/attachment.pgp>
