On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 03:56:13PM +0000, Michael Rogers wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >When accessing the RSSK, the client will automatically fetch each
> >trusted person's SSK. Normally we will get a DNF on each of these. This
> >indicates success, and the result is that the node will follow the
> >redirect.
> 
> Are you sure it's a good idea to assume success if a revocation can't be 
> found? An attacker might be able to temporarily DoS the revocations.

If so, there is a serious problem with Freenet itself, as every time a
user accesses that site the data will be searched for and propagated if
it can be found. I don't see any real problem with this.
> 
> How about this: the RSSK contains an expiry period (say, a week - the 
> expiry periods must be long enough to allow for very loose clock synch). 
> The user fetches each SSK, which contains a status field 
> (OK/revoke/panic). If the status is OK and the SSK has been updated more 
> recently than the expiry period, the vote is counted in favour. If the 
> SSK can't be found or the status is revoke or the SSK is older than the 
> expiry period, the vote is counted against. If the status is panic, the 
> redirect is not followed.
> 
> This method fails safe when publishers forget to update their SSKs, but 
> the redirect will start working again as soon as they remember. It also 
> gives publishers the option of destroying their keys if there isn't time 
> to insert a revocation (reminds me of the old days on this list, with 
> Travis Beman talking about attaching thermite to his hard drive... but 
> anyway...)

:)

I don't think it's reasonable to expect each of the Freenet Project's
official freesite trustees to insert a file every week indicating status
okay to the best of their knowledge. Well maybe. Any thoughts?
> 
> Cheers,
> Michael
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20060217/bd8a674b/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to