Is it worth breaking backwards compatibility for the 0.7 datastore (with prior builds of 0.7) to fix an inherent 64TB limit?
The code uses an int for offsets into files, which is easily fixed. However it also uses, on disk, an int for block numbers. This means datastores are limited to 2G * 32K = 64TB. Normally I wouldn't regard this as a big problem, but since we are in pre-alpha, and since there isn't that much content, I'm inclined to make the change... -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20060218/ec03b602/attachment.pgp>
