Of course, they may be in a container...
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 02:02:40PM +0100, Lars Juel Nielsen wrote: > On 12/24/05, Jusa Saari <jargonautti at hotmail.com> wrote: > > > So essentially you're asking if FProxy could spider whole sites > > > recursively (or only for one or X levels of depth) in the background every > > > time the user hits a site... ? > > > > No, I want FProxy to retrieve all the images pointed to by the "img" tags > > in the page. There is no recursion there, since no HTML files are loaded > > in this matter. > > > > I just want image galleries to be usefull without having to resort to > > FUQID. As is, they aren't. > > I think your idea is good, as for the problem with images being added > to the queue but you decide you don't want to see them all anyway and > they thus only waste resourses, make some markers in the queue to keep > track of which images belong to which page and then remove all images > for a specific page if none of them haven been requested by the > browser in a reasonable amount of time. -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20060104/e32b65b8/attachment.pgp>
