Agreed, will be decimal in the next version. Speak now or forever... On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 07:41:58AM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > > On 19 Jan 2006, at 06:40, sandos wrote: > > >Matthew Toseland wrote: > >>We now have a very basic FCP implementation working in 0.7, from > >>build > >>362 onwards. > > > >--- > > > >>DataLength=19000 // hex for 100kB > > > >Why in hexdecimal? For colors, sure makes some sense. For numbers > >in an otherwise very clean-looking textual protocol, it doesnt make > >sense imo. > > Agreed, using hex is silly and introduces unnecessary uncertainty, we > learned that last time around - lets stick to decimal unless there is > a really good reason. > > Ian. > _______________________________________________ > Tech mailing list > Tech at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
-- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20060119/806bde9e/attachment.pgp>
