I agree that it's a good idea, and I'd be happy to shut down  
Ubernode.org when it's working.

Ubernode.org is a hack, to help ensure people can connect. It's not a  
faux-opennet, but it's not optimal, either. I'd be happy to shut it  
down.
iFreed is a community-based site, which would survive, but change a  
bit. SinnerG would have to make that call.



That said, I do agree with toad, that there should be a reason for  
people to still use the darknet, to help ensure that a number of  
people still DO use the Darknet. I proposed one way to help ensure  
this- Expose the work freenet is doing to get through NAT, track IP,  
etc, to other programs, by forwarding packets from other programs,  
acting as a Hamachi-style server. This helps to ensure people  
actually connect via the darknet, and actually connect //With their  
friends//.

-Colin


On Jul 9, 2006, at 2:02 PM, Ian Clarke wrote:

> I think it is clear to most people that the lack of an opennet  
> option is proving to be a major inhibitor to adoption.  What we  
> have learned in practice is that if you only give a darknet option  
> to people who are clearly willing to connect to strangers, then  
> they will create their own opennet using kludges like ifreed.net  
> and ubernode.org.  Most Freenet users appear happy to connect to  
> strangers, this isn't surprising, nor is it undesirable.  The goal  
> of 0.7 was *never* to force everyone to form connections manually,  
> the goal was to provide that option to those that want it.
>
> I believe that Freenet 0.5-style "destination sampling" should work  
> fine in conjunction with darknet connection swapping, as both  
> algorithms have proven themselves robust in practice.  We should  
> simulate this to be sure.
>
> I really think we need to up the priority of opennet, as I think  
> currently we are squandering interest in Freenet by forcing people  
> to manually create connections to users.
>
> Ian.
> _______________________________________________
> Tech mailing list
> Tech at freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech


Reply via email to