What did? The number of TOO OLD's? On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 06:33:42PM -0400, Colin Davis wrote: > It started out 30 ish, and dropped to 15 ish the day before. I don't > have exact numbers anymore. > > > On Jun 30, 2006, at 4:53 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > >And before the last mandatory? > > > >On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 04:48:19PM -0400, Colin Davis wrote: > >>> > >>>Yeah... maybe we need update-over-mandatory for alpha 2... The > >>>question > >>>is, are we losing significant numbers of users now because of this? > >>>> > >> > >> > >> > >>I currently have 48 users that are too old. > >> > >> > >> > >>Connected: 63 > >>Backed off: 33 > >>Too old: 48 > >>Never Connected: 8 > >>Listening: 4 > >-- > >Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org > >Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ > >ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. > >_______________________________________________ > >Tech mailing list > >Tech at freenetproject.org > >http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech > > _______________________________________________ > Tech mailing list > Tech at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech >
-- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20060701/51137039/attachment.pgp>
