What about having user republish The Public Index, after editing it manually, to remove anything.. Questionable that might be inserted.
On Jun 23, 2006, at 7:59 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > We need an index for 0.7. > > Current candidates: > > Index .7 Freesite Darknet > PRO: Non-public. > CON: Hasn't been updated in quite some time. > We include this now... > > The Public Index .7 Darknet > PRO: Updated regularly. > CON: Public index. Meaning some enemy will redirect it to a child porn > site on the day we release 0.7. So we can't include it, no matter how > good it is. > We can never include this. > > FreeHoo > PRO: Looks good, non-public, highly descriptive. > CON: Infrequently updated, very few sites. > We probably should include this anyway. > > The Ugly Index > PRO: Non-public > CON: Very very ugly! Not very user friendly. > Probably will not include this. > > Foogle (Freenet Spider Indexer) > PRO: Non-public > CON: Only 15 sites (the public index has 50!) > Probably will not include this. > > > The logical conclusion of all this is that we need another, > maintained, > index! Even if Index .7 Freenet Darknet is going to be updated > regularly > - the last update was on the 9th so this is possible - we should > really > have more than one. > -- > Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org > Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ > ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. > _______________________________________________ > Tech mailing list > Tech at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
